ARTICLE:ANALYSIS_BY[name] student0 ARTICLE:ANALYSIS_TIME[minutes] 999 ARTICLE:COMMENT[string] student3: not yet implemented | student0: The programming langueage in question is not mentioned in the article, but is mentioned in references. But I think this should be classified as a study/talk. ARTICLE:COMMERCIAL_EFFORT[none,part,full] none ARTICLE:GRANT_SUPPORT[none or string] none ARTICLE:NSF-SUPPORT[none or number] none ARTICLE:IMPLEMENTATION_EXISTS[unknown,hardware,yes,no] no ARTICLE:LINK[url] dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2384736 ARTICLE:STATUS[not_finished,finished] finished BIBTEX:LABEL[string] Nishino12 AUTHOR:NAMES[list of first_last] Hiroki_Nishino BIBTEX:LINK[url] http://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/bibtex/conf/oopsla/Nishino12 BUILD:ANALYSIS_BY[name] BUILD:ANALYSIS_TIME[minutes] BUILD:COMMENT[string] BUILD:STATUS[one of {unknown,needed,not_needed,started,finished} and list of {downloaded,compiles,runs}] not_needed BUILD:ERROR_COMMENT[none,not_needed,comment] not_needed EMAIL:STATUS[unknown,not_needed,not_found or list of {needed,request_1,response_1,sent_thank_you}] not_needed PI:COMMENT_CC[string] There's no implementation here. They just describe an unimplemented language design. PI:COMMENT_TP[string] TOOL:NAME[string] LCSynth TOOL:ARTICLE_LINK[unknown,none,url,broken and url] none TOOL:GOOGLE_LINK[unknown,none,url,broken and url] none TOOL:EMAIL_LINK[unknown,none,sent_no_url,url,broken and url] TOOL:DATA_LINK[unknown,none,url,broken and url] unknown VERIFY:ANALYSIS_BY[name] student4 VERIFY:STATUS[unknown,needed,not_needed,started,finished] finished VERIFY:COMMENT[string] none EMAIL1:CODE_AVAILABLE[yes,no,no_response] EMAIL1:REMARK[comment]