SURVEY:SUMMARY:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] not_applicable
SURVEY:SUMMARY:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] theoretical
SURVEY:SUMMARY:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] 
SURVEY:SUMMARY:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] not_applicable
SURVEY:SUMMARY:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] not_applicable
SURVEY:SUMMARY:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] not_applicable
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] not_applicable
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY_COMMENT[string] none
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] theoretical
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLIC_COMMENT[string] The label "theoretical" may be a misleading synonym for "not backed by code". In terms of everyday English usage, our CCS'12 paper is both theoretical and practical.  But the code associated to this project was described in a follow-on paper of ours, "Efficient Garbling from a Fixed-Key Blockcipher" (2013).
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] not_applicable
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] not_applicable
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION_COMMENT[string] none
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] not_applicable