SURVEY:SUMMARY:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] reasonable_effort
SURVEY:SUMMARY:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] practical
SURVEY:SUMMARY:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] 
SURVEY:SUMMARY:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes
SURVEY:SUMMARY:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] yes
SURVEY:SUMMARY:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] reasonable_effort
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] practical
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLIC_COMMENT[string] We worked hard to make the code work and usable by others.  From feedback we have received from other projects, we note that while building the software is straightforward, there are parameters that must be configured specifically to the hardware it's run on (in particular, the amount of memory and SSD used), if running the code on hardware different from that we used.  *Performance* repeatability is more tricky than just re-running the code, unfortunately.
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] yes
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes