SURVEY:SUMMARY:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] reasonable_effort
SURVEY:SUMMARY:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] practical
SURVEY:SUMMARY:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] 
SURVEY:SUMMARY:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes
SURVEY:SUMMARY:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] no_but_available
SURVEY:SUMMARY:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY[not_applicable, reasonable_effort, code_problematic or string] reasonable_effort
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:BUILD_DIFFICULTY_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION[practical,theoretical,hardware] practical
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CLASSIFICATION_COMMENT[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:CORRECT_CODE_LOCATION[string] 
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLIC_COMMENT[string] We have recently (Aug. 1, 2014) released a much improved version of the system -- see www.dbtoaster.org
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:PUBLISHED_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION[not_applicable, yes, no_but_available, no_and_not_available] no_but_available
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:SAME_VERSION_COMMENT[string] The answer may be yes. I remember that we made some fixes, but I am not sure how consequential they were. The released version performs at least as well as the version used in the experiments of the paper. We have all old versions in an svn repository.
SURVEY:AUTHOR1:STUDY_FOUND_CORRECT_CODE[not_applicable, yes, no] yes